learntolearn

Learn: what…why…how…you and…

Beliefs about Learning: Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory

Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development was an early influence in my study of Models of Learning.   His work gained wide attention in the 1970’s.

https://www.psychologynoteshq.com/vygotsky-theory/   BY PSYCHOLOGY NOTES HQ · MAY 2  2018

Lev Semenovich Vygotsky, a Russian psychologist who lived during the Russian Revolution, developed a theory of development known as the Sociocultural Theory of Cognitive Development in the early twentieth century.    As a proponent of the sociocultural perspective to development, Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory gained worldwide recognition. It began to exert influence when his work was finally translated into English in 1962 and the importance of both sociocultural perspective of development and cross-cultural research was recognized.

Vygotsky’s main assertion was that children are entrenched in different sociocultural contexts and their cognitive development is advanced through social interaction with more skilled individuals. The Vygotsky theory of cognitive development is mainly concerned with the more complex cognitive activities of children that are governed and influenced by several principles. Believing that children construct knowledge actively, Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory is also one of those responsible for laying the groundwork for constructivism.’ Highlight or Color in red for distinguishing factors

ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT

‘Vygotsky is most recognized for his concept of Zone of Proximal Development or ZPD pertaining to the learning of children. Children who are in the zone of proximal development for a specific task can almost perform the task independently, but not quite there yet. However, with an appropriate amount of assistance, these children can accomplish the task successfully….’

‘The lower limit of a child’s zone of proximal development is the level of analysis and problem-solving reached by a child without any help. The upper limit, on the other hand, is the level of additional responsibility that a child can receive with the support of a skilled instructor…’

‘As children are verbally given instructions or shown how to perform certain tasks, they organize the new information received in their existing mental schemas in order to assist them in the ultimate goal of performing the task independently…  ..his conviction that social influences, particularly instruction, are of immense importance on the cognitive development of children.’

MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE OTHER

‘….These adults (parents and teachers) need to direct and organize the learning experiences to ensure that the children can master and internalize the learning.

….any person who possesses a higher skill level than the learner with regard to a particular task or concept is called a More Knowledgeable’…

SCAFFOLDING

‘….Scaffolding refers to the temporary support given to a child by More Knowledgeable Others, until such time that the child can already perform the task independently.’

‘Scaffolding entails changing the quality and quantity of support provided..in the course of a teaching session. The more-skilled instructor adjusts the level of guidance needed in order to fit the student’s current level of performance. For novel tasks, the instructor may utilize direct instruction. As the child gains more familiarity with the task and becomes more skilled at it, the instructor may then provide less guidance’.

….’ When the child has learned to complete the task independently, the scaffolds are removed by the adult, as they are no longer needed ‘.

….research attention has been shifted from the individual onto larger interactional units such as parent and child, teacher and child, or brother and sister.

‘Vygotsky’s theory likewise called attention to the variability of cultural realities,….. ….It would not be fitting, therefore, to utilize the developmental experiences of children from one culture as a norm for children from other cultures.’

‘Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of cognitive development has significant ramifications in education and cognitive testing. Vygotsky was a strong advocate of non-standard assessment procedures for the assessment of what and how much a child has learned and in the formulation of approaches that could enhance the child’s learning. His ideas have effected changes in educational systems through the increased importance given to the active role of students in their own learning process and the encouragement of teacher-student collaboration in a reciprocal learning experience.’

 

 

No Comments »

What is the Basis for a Teacher’s Beliefs About Learning

I’m starting my answer to this question with a “model” of learning that has had a significant influence on my learning and teaching since the 1980’s:  Authentic Learning.

Authentic Learning: An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments J. Herrington University of Wollongong, janherrington@gmail.com R. Oliver Edith Cowan University, r.oliver@ecu.edu.au

https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1031&context=edupapers  Excerpts

Abstract: The instructional technology community is in the midst of a philosophical shift from a behaviorist to a constructivist framework, a move that may begin to address the growing rift between formal school learning and real-life learning. One theory of learning that has the capacity to promote authentic learning is that of situated learning…..”

“There have been several attempts to use the findings of the research into contextualised learning to design a model of instruction….. However, it was Brown, Collins and Duguid (1989b) who developed a focus for the theory of situated cognition or situated learning and produced a proposal for a model of instruction that has implications for classroom practice. Collins (1988) defines situated learning as: ‘the notion of learning knowledge and skills in contexts that reflect the way the knowledge will be useful in real life’ (p. 2)….”

research aims The purpose of this research was to determine the possibility of applying a model of instructional design based on the theory of situated learning to the design of a multimedia learning environment for The university students, and to investigate students’ responses to that learning environment.”  Their original intent for this article, but my focus in on the background of the Authentic Learning Model.“…

…”usable knowledge is best gained in learning  environments which feature the following characteristics. Situated learning environments:“ How can these situated theories be operationalised?’ (Brown & Duguid, 1993, p. 10)… Brown, Collins and Duguid (1989b), in their original article presented a nascent theory of situated learning which has the potential to provide a theoretical basis for a new framework for multimedia design and development. From the start they suggested that their model was the beginning of the process of developing a theoretical perspective for successful learning that cognitive science had, to date, not been able to explain. The challenge put to researchers was to identify the critical aspects of situated learning to enable it to translate into teaching methods which could be applied in the classroom. In response to this challenge, a practical framework for the design of learning environments was produced. Essentially, current literature suggests that usable knowledge is best gained in learning environments which feature the following characteristics.  Situated Learning:

• Provide authentic context that reflect the way the knowledge will be used in real life   (e.g., Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Collins, 1988; Gulikers, Bastiaens, &  Martens, 2005)

• Provide authentic activities (e.g., Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, 1990; Jonassen, 1991; Young, 1993)

• Provide access to expert performances and the modelling of processes (e.g.,Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989; Lave & Wenger, 1991)

• Provide multiple roles and perspectives (e.g., Bransford, Sherwood, Hasselbring,Kinzer, & Williams, 1990; Honebein, Duffy, & Fishman, 1993; Lave & Wenger, 1991; Spiro, Feltovich, Jacobson, & Coulson, 1991)

• Support collaborative construction of knowledge (e.g., Bransford, Sherwood,Hasselbring, Kinzer, & Williams, 1990; Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989)

• Promote reflection to enable abstractions to be formed (e.g., Boud, Keogh, &Walker, 1985; Norman, 1993)

• Promote articulation to enable tacit knowledge to be made explicit (e.g., Lave &Wenger, 1991; Pea, 1991; Vygotsky, 1978)

• Provide coaching by the teacher at critical times, and scaffolding and fading of teacher support (e.g., Collins, 1988; Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989; Greenfield,1984; Harley, 1993)

• Provide for authentic, integrated assessment of learning within the tasks (e.g.,Gulikers, Bastiaens, & Kirschner, 2004; Herrington & Herrington, 1998; McLellan,1993; Reeves & Okey, 1996; Young, 1993, 1995).

No Comments »

“Winning at Learning” 2.0

An Earlier Version of “Winning at Learning” provided a brief introduction.

This upcoming version will expand the ideas, provide multiple links, and suggestion classroom and home-based activities.  It will offer “mini” workshops.

It will focus on Executive Function Skills and suggest ways to extend those skills to learning to read!

Image result for children clipart winning

No Comments »

One Path to Facilitating a Child’s Executive Function Learning

What Path Can We Follow to Facilitate a Child’s Executive Function Learning?

Here’s one pathway to follow:

Begin with a Tentative Definition.

Understand Normal Development of Cognitive/Social/Emotional Learning.

Exploring Models of Executive Function, including models that address, for example, Self-Management, Self-Direction, Self-Regulation.  These “Self-“ models often address the same attitudes, skills and behavior.

Translating the most promising model for your situation into Context-Based Instruction

*Begin with a Plan to Understand and Collaborate with Individual Children

*Choose Instructional Principles

*Sequence Goals and Objectives

*Engage in Diagnostic Teaching

*Monitor Progress

*Work toward Generalization

Apply to A Domain and then Across Domains

Continue to Grow By Following the Literature (Reference List)

 

 

No Comments »

Student to Student Feedback

Developing Students’ Ability to Give and Take Effective Feedback  By Katrina Schwartz OCTOBER 15, 2017

https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2017/10/15/developing-students-ability-to-give-and-take-effective-feedback/

An Excerpt:

“Training kids to give effective critique is one of those teaching strategies that takes some time on the front end, but can save a lot of time once students get good at it. It’s common for students to give unhelpful, general or unkind feedback that doesn’t do much to advance a peer’s goals for the work, but Lukas found when she carefully trained students on some conversational “commandments” and attitudes around peer critique, 12-year-olds could give feedback as well as any adult. Even better, when kids got feedback from peers, she found they internalized it more.”

No Comments »

Growth Mindset (4M’s) that goes beyond “effort”

One of the best Growth Mindset postings I’ve read!

Four Teaching Moves That Promote A Growth Mindset In All Readers

By Katrina SchwartzAPRIL 3, 2017Mind Shift

https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2017/04/03/four-strategies-that-promote-a-growth-mindset-in-struggling-readers/

Some short excerpts:

“Most often teachers spend their time assigning what students should read and how they should show what they read, monitoring to make sure students have done what was asked, and making decisions about what students will do and how they will do it. Those roles make the teacher the main driver of the learning. In order to step back from those traditional roles, teachers have to replace them with new strategies.

“There’s a place for those three, but when that’s our main role there isn’t space for ownership and to develop that growth mindset,” Goldberg said. She coaches teachers to think of themselves in four very different roles, and to step back from constantly stepping in when students struggle. A big part of that is making it clear that struggle is part of reading, not a unique experience to students learning to read. It’s common to start a book and be confused, or to read a passage and miss something, but teachers don’t often make it clear how universal that experience is, no matter one’s reading level. Rather than being assignors, monitors and managers, Goldberg coaches teachers to see themselves as miners, mirrors, models and mentors”

I encourage you to watch the 7 minute video where Goldberg teaches us how to be miners, mirrors, models and mentors.  The article continues with a description of these 4M roles.

 

 

No Comments »

Feedback is Essential to Learning How to Learn

Actionable Feedback Is Essential for Growth

By Starr Sackstein on October 16, 2016 7:08 AM

 

http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/work_in_progress/2016/10/actionable_feedback_is_essenti.html?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=workinprogress

A short excerpt:

Perhaps it’s just the new buzz word of the moment or maybe it’s the missing piece in how we make feedback more meaningful, but actionable feedback means not only identifying what needs improvement, but also offering a plan of action to make the necessary improvement possible.

It’s easy enough to tell a person what’s wrong with their writing or a math set but it is a whole other thing to help them understand how to tackle the challenge and start to improve it. This is clearly more important than naming the problem.

Too often in education we spend time naming problems rather solving them. We talk about what’s wrong at length instead of living in solutions.

Actionable feedback is where the solutions begin….”

 

No Comments »

Self-Assessment

Practices that work from

http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/work_in_progress/2016/05/student_self-assessment_practi.html

A short excerpt

Student Self-Assessment Practices That Work

By Starr Sackstein on May 26, 2016 5:00 AM

“Understanding how we learn best is one of the keys to growth as human beings. This essential metacognitive skill is not innate and must be modeled and taught in school starting as early as possible.

The way it looks for different age groups will be different, obviously as younger students are not always cognitively ready to do this kind of thinking. However with the right scaffolds in place, reflection and self-assessment can be a rich way to extend the depth of independent learning and also aid in informing the teacher about valuable data around growth and understanding.”

 

 

No Comments »

SMART Goals for Learning

SMART GOALS for Learning from the Reading Sage

http://reading-sage.blogspot.com/2016/08/smart-gl-for-student-success.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReadingSageReviews+%28Reading+Sage+Reviews%29

A short excerpt:  Hope you read the whole post from August 20, 2016

SMART Gоаlѕ For Student Success!

Setting SMART Goals and Objectives with Students

 

“Creating SMART goals and student action plans (SAP) to address student learning and behavior issues is the key to turning around your classroom and your school.

Today the world is getting smarter and sharper than ever before.

 

Students who are goal oriented problem-solvers and possess a growth mindset will play a vital role in building the future of our world. So, today we need to guide parents and students to develop S.M.A.R.T. goals and objective to achieve their maximum potential. Unpacking the SMART goal-setting acronym and developing a SMART goal action plan, we have
S… Specific
M…Measurable
A…Attainable
R….Realistic
T…Timely and Tangible”…….

 

 

No Comments »

Learning to learn, Feedback and Assessment

Learning, Feedback and Assessment

Do we dare give up grades?  Starr Sackstein thinks so…  What do you think?

A short excerpt from her blog:

http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/work_in_progress/2016/08/approaching_the_new_year_with_.html?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=workinprogress

Approaching the New Year With a No Grades Classroom

By Starr Sackstein on August 18, 2016 5:43 AM

“……it’s a whole philosophical shift that you’re ready to make because you know it will benefit kids.

 

Now it’s time to start a new year fresh without grades or at least some version of a standards based classroom that strays from traditional beliefs about how grades communicate learning and you want to make sure you do it right….”

 

No Comments »

Skip to toolbar