learntolearn

Learn: what…why…how…you and…

A Plan for Understanding How Children Learn to be Learners

A sequence of posts.

Exploring Learning Models of that are related to Executive Function,

*SocioCultural/Vygotsky (August 30, 2018)

*Behavioral (September 5, 2018)

*Concept-Based Learning (September 19, 2018)

*More than Content: Concepts Plus Process (October 3, 2018)

*Information Processing from a Developmental Point of View/Sternberg and Flavell (October 31 2018)

* * * * *

*Begin with a Plan to Understand and Collaborate with Individual Children About Their Learning (This is our next series of posts.)

                                                            * * * * *

Translating the most promising model for your situation into Context-Based Instruction

 

*Choose Instructional Principles

*Sequence Goals and Objectives

*Engage in Diagnostic Teaching

*Monitor Progress and Make Necessary Changes

*Work toward Generalization

*Apply to A Domain and then Across Domains

*Continue to Grow By Following the Literature

 

 

 

 

No Comments »

Beliefs about Learning: Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory

Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development was an early influence in my study of Models of Learning.   His work gained wide attention in the 1970’s.

https://www.psychologynoteshq.com/vygotsky-theory/   BY PSYCHOLOGY NOTES HQ · MAY 2  2018

Lev Semenovich Vygotsky, a Russian psychologist who lived during the Russian Revolution, developed a theory of development known as the Sociocultural Theory of Cognitive Development in the early twentieth century.    As a proponent of the sociocultural perspective to development, Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory gained worldwide recognition. It began to exert influence when his work was finally translated into English in 1962 and the importance of both sociocultural perspective of development and cross-cultural research was recognized.

Vygotsky’s main assertion was that children are entrenched in different sociocultural contexts and their cognitive development is advanced through social interaction with more skilled individuals. The Vygotsky theory of cognitive development is mainly concerned with the more complex cognitive activities of children that are governed and influenced by several principles. Believing that children construct knowledge actively, Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory is also one of those responsible for laying the groundwork for constructivism.’ Highlight or Color in red for distinguishing factors

ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT

‘Vygotsky is most recognized for his concept of Zone of Proximal Development or ZPD pertaining to the learning of children. Children who are in the zone of proximal development for a specific task can almost perform the task independently, but not quite there yet. However, with an appropriate amount of assistance, these children can accomplish the task successfully….’

‘The lower limit of a child’s zone of proximal development is the level of analysis and problem-solving reached by a child without any help. The upper limit, on the other hand, is the level of additional responsibility that a child can receive with the support of a skilled instructor…’

‘As children are verbally given instructions or shown how to perform certain tasks, they organize the new information received in their existing mental schemas in order to assist them in the ultimate goal of performing the task independently…  ..his conviction that social influences, particularly instruction, are of immense importance on the cognitive development of children.’

MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE OTHER

‘….These adults (parents and teachers) need to direct and organize the learning experiences to ensure that the children can master and internalize the learning.

….any person who possesses a higher skill level than the learner with regard to a particular task or concept is called a More Knowledgeable’…

SCAFFOLDING

‘….Scaffolding refers to the temporary support given to a child by More Knowledgeable Others, until such time that the child can already perform the task independently.’

‘Scaffolding entails changing the quality and quantity of support provided..in the course of a teaching session. The more-skilled instructor adjusts the level of guidance needed in order to fit the student’s current level of performance. For novel tasks, the instructor may utilize direct instruction. As the child gains more familiarity with the task and becomes more skilled at it, the instructor may then provide less guidance’.

….’ When the child has learned to complete the task independently, the scaffolds are removed by the adult, as they are no longer needed ‘.

….research attention has been shifted from the individual onto larger interactional units such as parent and child, teacher and child, or brother and sister.

‘Vygotsky’s theory likewise called attention to the variability of cultural realities,….. ….It would not be fitting, therefore, to utilize the developmental experiences of children from one culture as a norm for children from other cultures.’

‘Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of cognitive development has significant ramifications in education and cognitive testing. Vygotsky was a strong advocate of non-standard assessment procedures for the assessment of what and how much a child has learned and in the formulation of approaches that could enhance the child’s learning. His ideas have effected changes in educational systems through the increased importance given to the active role of students in their own learning process and the encouragement of teacher-student collaboration in a reciprocal learning experience.’

 

 

No Comments »

What is the Basis for a Teacher’s Beliefs About Learning

I’m starting my answer to this question with a “model” of learning that has had a significant influence on my learning and teaching since the 1980’s:  Authentic Learning.

Authentic Learning: An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments J. Herrington University of Wollongong, janherrington@gmail.com R. Oliver Edith Cowan University, r.oliver@ecu.edu.au

https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1031&context=edupapers  Excerpts

Abstract: The instructional technology community is in the midst of a philosophical shift from a behaviorist to a constructivist framework, a move that may begin to address the growing rift between formal school learning and real-life learning. One theory of learning that has the capacity to promote authentic learning is that of situated learning…..”

“There have been several attempts to use the findings of the research into contextualised learning to design a model of instruction….. However, it was Brown, Collins and Duguid (1989b) who developed a focus for the theory of situated cognition or situated learning and produced a proposal for a model of instruction that has implications for classroom practice. Collins (1988) defines situated learning as: ‘the notion of learning knowledge and skills in contexts that reflect the way the knowledge will be useful in real life’ (p. 2)….”

research aims The purpose of this research was to determine the possibility of applying a model of instructional design based on the theory of situated learning to the design of a multimedia learning environment for The university students, and to investigate students’ responses to that learning environment.”  Their original intent for this article, but my focus in on the background of the Authentic Learning Model.“…

…”usable knowledge is best gained in learning  environments which feature the following characteristics. Situated learning environments:“ How can these situated theories be operationalised?’ (Brown & Duguid, 1993, p. 10)… Brown, Collins and Duguid (1989b), in their original article presented a nascent theory of situated learning which has the potential to provide a theoretical basis for a new framework for multimedia design and development. From the start they suggested that their model was the beginning of the process of developing a theoretical perspective for successful learning that cognitive science had, to date, not been able to explain. The challenge put to researchers was to identify the critical aspects of situated learning to enable it to translate into teaching methods which could be applied in the classroom. In response to this challenge, a practical framework for the design of learning environments was produced. Essentially, current literature suggests that usable knowledge is best gained in learning environments which feature the following characteristics.  Situated Learning:

• Provide authentic context that reflect the way the knowledge will be used in real life   (e.g., Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Collins, 1988; Gulikers, Bastiaens, &  Martens, 2005)

• Provide authentic activities (e.g., Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, 1990; Jonassen, 1991; Young, 1993)

• Provide access to expert performances and the modelling of processes (e.g.,Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989; Lave & Wenger, 1991)

• Provide multiple roles and perspectives (e.g., Bransford, Sherwood, Hasselbring,Kinzer, & Williams, 1990; Honebein, Duffy, & Fishman, 1993; Lave & Wenger, 1991; Spiro, Feltovich, Jacobson, & Coulson, 1991)

• Support collaborative construction of knowledge (e.g., Bransford, Sherwood,Hasselbring, Kinzer, & Williams, 1990; Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989)

• Promote reflection to enable abstractions to be formed (e.g., Boud, Keogh, &Walker, 1985; Norman, 1993)

• Promote articulation to enable tacit knowledge to be made explicit (e.g., Lave &Wenger, 1991; Pea, 1991; Vygotsky, 1978)

• Provide coaching by the teacher at critical times, and scaffolding and fading of teacher support (e.g., Collins, 1988; Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989; Greenfield,1984; Harley, 1993)

• Provide for authentic, integrated assessment of learning within the tasks (e.g.,Gulikers, Bastiaens, & Kirschner, 2004; Herrington & Herrington, 1998; McLellan,1993; Reeves & Okey, 1996; Young, 1993, 1995).

No Comments »

AGENCY as an Over-Arching Concept to Address both Cognitive/Learning Voice & Social/Emotional Voice

AGENCY

http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/nqsplp/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/NQS_PLP_E-Newsletter_No64.pdf

Having a voice

When children have a say in what is going on around them, they start to develop the sense that their ideas and opinions matter.  As educators we can encourage children’s sense of agency by

welcoming and responding thoughtfully and respectfully to their questions and ideas and, where possible, incorporating their ideas and suggestions when we plan and implement experiences. Allowing children a voice in what goes on means sharing some of our power and control, but it also helps to promote a more positive, open and cooperative dynamic between adults and children.           

 Vital ways of listening to and honouring children’s voices include using children’s interests as the basis for our programs; responding to children’s criticisms or comments; and allowing children to help make decisions that affect them.

 However, this listening can happen in more subtle ways as well. As educators we have a responsibility to respond to what children are telling us—both directly and through their behaviour and actions.

Reading children’s cues and responding to them is an important skill for educators to have. This is especially the case with very young children who may not be able to communicate their needs and wishes verbally.

…….”

No Comments »

One Path to Facilitating a Child’s Executive Function Learning

What Path Can We Follow to Facilitate a Child’s Executive Function Learning?

Here’s one pathway to follow:

Begin with a Tentative Definition.

Understand Normal Development of Cognitive/Social/Emotional Learning.

Exploring Models of Executive Function, including models that address, for example, Self-Management, Self-Direction, Self-Regulation.  These “Self-“ models often address the same attitudes, skills and behavior.

Translating the most promising model for your situation into Context-Based Instruction

*Begin with a Plan to Understand and Collaborate with Individual Children

*Choose Instructional Principles

*Sequence Goals and Objectives

*Engage in Diagnostic Teaching

*Monitor Progress

*Work toward Generalization

Apply to A Domain and then Across Domains

Continue to Grow By Following the Literature (Reference List)

 

 

No Comments »

Student to Student Feedback

Developing Students’ Ability to Give and Take Effective Feedback  By Katrina Schwartz OCTOBER 15, 2017

https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2017/10/15/developing-students-ability-to-give-and-take-effective-feedback/

An Excerpt:

“Training kids to give effective critique is one of those teaching strategies that takes some time on the front end, but can save a lot of time once students get good at it. It’s common for students to give unhelpful, general or unkind feedback that doesn’t do much to advance a peer’s goals for the work, but Lukas found when she carefully trained students on some conversational “commandments” and attitudes around peer critique, 12-year-olds could give feedback as well as any adult. Even better, when kids got feedback from peers, she found they internalized it more.”

No Comments »

Student Voice and Choice: A Few Teacher/Learner Considerations

Here is an excerpt from a teacher’s point of view about student voice.  For me, this raises a lot of questions:

How do age/grade level impact student voice/choice?

How are choice and teacher mandates (CCSS, for example) related?

How does knowing “what it means to learn” influence student voice/choice.

Here is one starting place – from a high school teacher’s point of view:

Do We Give Students Too Much Choice? By Brian Field

http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/08/24/do-we-give-students-too-much-choice.html

August 23, 2016

A few brief excerpts:

There is an increased focus on student choice in K-12 education today. This focus has created more student-centered classrooms that use problem-based learning and differentiation of instruction to give students agency in what and how they learn. As a high school teacher, I understand why teachers feel the necessity to cater to all of their students’ strengths by providing opportunities for student choice. But, as schools try to incorporate student-centered initiatives into the classroom, there is often a lack of critical consideration for the potentially negative effects increased choice may have on student learning…..

 

The new question now becomes: What degree of choice should we have? Though these studies apply to retail, they have grounds in the field of education regarding student choice. As these studies help to show, the current debate surrounding this classroom strategy is not whether students should have choice, but to what degree student choice is effective…..

I have learned in my own experiences that effective feedback takes copious amounts of time when all students complete the same assignment—and the greater variety of student choice only increases that time. There needs to be a balance between an appropriate amount of student choice and the ability of the teacher to impart the feedback necessary to reach maximum student growth in a timely manner….

 

No Comments »

Connecting Student Voice, Thinking and Learning

A few more of the links from the Reading Sage post on Oracy

http://reading-sage.blogspot.com/2017/02/developing-oracy-with-daily-dialogue.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReadingSageReviews+%28Reading+Sage+Reviews%29

Just a few of many links on oracy from the Reading Sage posting

Oracy in the Classroom: Strategies for Effective Talk | Edutopia Oracy in the Classroom: Strategies for Effective Talk | Edutopia
Teaching oracy means putting more intention behind how you guide and organize your students’ talk. When they gather for group work or …

Oracy: The Literacy of the Spoken Word | Edutopia
Teaching oracy is instrumental to better reading and, in particular, writing. In developmental terms, humans acquire oral language first — a …

Oracy Assessment Toolkit : Faculty of Education
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the need to help young people develop their abilities to use spoken language effectively. Employers …
Teaching oracy means putting more intention behind how you guide and organize your students’ talk. When they gather for group work or …

No Comments »

How, When and Where Do Students Begin to Use Their Voices for Learning?

I just finished a post on my Dialogue blog about being “Open to Learning” that was addressed to Educational Leaders.  It consisted of excerpts from a pdf and video by Viviane M J Robinson,

The University of Auckland, an expert on school based communication.  This particular link addresses the ways in which educational leaders/administrators can communicate with teachers about learning.

file:///C:/Users/Owner/Downloads/Open-to learning_Conversations_Background_Paper_In%20(1).pdf

As I finished the post and began to think about students’ voices, I began to wonder where the awareness of having a “voice” in one’s education/learning begins.  When and How do students learn to speak about their learning to those who have the power to respond to their views, interest and concerns?  And when/where to they learn to be silent?

I’ve been spending a lot of time lately in preschool and kindergarten.  Maybe that is a good place to start to understand how children/learners (students?) begin to think and talk about learning, their learning.

No Comments »

KaEL: Cognitive Apprenticeships (4)

 

Cognitive Apprenticeship:  Making Thinking Visible by Allan Collins, John Seely Brown, and Ann Holum:

Authors’ permission for publishing on the internet noted on internet site:  Reprinted with permission from the Winter 1991 issue of the AMERICAN EDUCATOR, the Quarterly journal of the American Federation of Teachers.

The authors draw a contrast between “cognitive apprenticeship” and both schooling and traditional “apprenticeship.”   They provide details about creating environments with focus on the content taught, pedagogical methods employed, the sequencing of learning activities and the sociology of learning.  Following a critique of schooling based on the lack of visibility of both the teacher’s and the students’ thinking and problem solving, they propose a model that:

“^Identifies the processes of the task and makes them visible to students;

 ^Situates abstract tasks in authentic contexts, so that students understand the relevant of the work; and

 ^Vary the diversity of situations and articulate the common aspects so that students can transfer wheat they learn.”

Before going into detail on the “cognitive apprenticeship” model, they offer examples in reading (Reciprocal Teaching). Writing ((1985; Scardamalia, Bereiter, and Steinbach, 1984), and Math (Schoenfeld (1983, 1985).

P.O.R.T.A.L.S. Cognitive Apprenticeship:  Making Thinking Visible by Allan Collins, John Seely Brown, and Ann Holum:

There are 4 dimensions to the Cognitive Apprenticeship model: Content (Domain Knowledge, Heuristic strategies, Control strategies, and Learning strategies); Method (Modeling, Coaching, Scaffolding, Articulation, Reflection, and Exploration); Sequencing (Global before local skills, Increasing complexity, and Increasing diversity), and Sociology (Situated learning, Community of practice, Intrinsic motivation and Cooperation)

Purpose Sociology: Intrinsic motivation;

Method: Exploration (teacher invites students to pose & solve their own problems

Operations Content: Heuristic strategies, Control strategies, Learning Strategies
Remembering Sequencing: By implication-tasks leading to generalization

Sociology: Situated Learning: Carrying out tasks and solving problem that reflect use in the future

Team Work Sociology: Situated learning. Community of practice, Cooperation.

Method: Modeling, Coaching, Scaffolding

Content: types of knowledge required for expertise: Heuristic strategies, Control strategies, Learning strategies)

Action Method: Exploration

Sequencing: Increasing complexity, Increasing diversity

Laying a Foundation Content: Domain Knowledge, Global before local (building a conceptual map before exploring the terrain)

Content: types of knowledge required for expertise: Heuristic strategies, Control strategies, Learning strategies)

Self-Management Method: Articulation, Reflection, Exploration

 

Some additional links. Note that some of these links have cautions about opening the link.

 

The 21st Century Learning Initiative gives you the full article from American Educator

http://www.21learn.org/archive/cognitive-apprenticeship-making-thinking-visible/

Remember to scroll down on this site to get to the article on Cognitive Apprenticeship

 

Cognitive Apprenticeship links:

http://web.cortland.edu/frieda/ID/IDtheories/37.html

 

Developed by Linda Darling-Hammond, Kim Austin, Ira Lit, and Daisy Martin With Contributions From Annmarie Palincsar Stanford University School of Education

http://www.learner.org/courses/learningclassroom/support/08_cog_app.pdf

 

No Comments »

Skip to toolbar