learntolearn

Learn: what…why…how…you and…

Information Processing: From a Developmental Perspective

Below are a few short excerpts from the last “model of learning” in this series.  These excerpts highlight the work of John Flavell and Robert Sternberg.  Their ideas address a range of learners:  those who succeed easily and those who are challenged.

I chose to focus on these two authors because of their emphasis on how learners process and manage information:  their attention, short term memory, working memory, long term memory, and problem solving skills.

“Educators are very interested in the study of how humans learn. This is because how one learns, acquires new information, and retains previous information guides selection of long-term learning objectives and methods of effective instruction. To this end, cognition as a psychological area of study goes far beyond simply the taking in and retrieving information. It is a broad field dedicated to the study of the mind holistically. Neisser (1967), one of the most influential researchers in cognition, defined it as the study of how people encode, structure, store, retrieve, use or otherwise learn knowledge. Cognitive psychologists hypothesize an intervening variable or set of variables between environment and behavior—which contrasts it with behavioral theories.”

http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/papers/infoproc.pdf

 Information Processing and Memory

“One of the primary areas of cognition studied by researches is memory. There are many hypotheses and suggestions as to how this integration occurs, and many new theories have built upon established beliefs in this area. Currently, there is widespread consensus on several aspects of information processing; however, there are many dissentions in reference to specifics on how the brain actually codes or manipulates information as it is stored in memory.”

……..

The implications of this research are clear. If learning—relatively permanently change—is to take place, new information must be transferred into long-term memory. Therefore, repetition and maintenance rehearsal are not sufficient to produce a lasting effect. This has great relevance to instruction and teaching, for if the aim of education is learning, information must be presented in such a way that it can be incorporated into the memory structure.”

Development of Memory and Information Processing

As previously stated, cognition is the encoding, structuring, storing, retrieving, using, or otherwise learning knowledge (Neisser, 1967). There are important developmental aspects for INFORMATION PROCESSING

According to Flavell et al. (2002), from an information processing perspective some of the most important are:

 

  1. Brain changes brought about by biological maturation or experience;
  2. Increased processing capacity, speed, and efficiency as a result of both maturation and knowledge development;
  3. Modifications of connections in a neural network;
  4. New emergent concepts arising from repeated self-organization as a result of adapting to the demands of a changing environment; and
  5. Increased capacity for problem-solving and metacognition

 

“Another theorist firmly grounded in the information processing approach is Sternberg (1988). Sternberg’s theory suggests that development is skills-based and continuous rather than staged and discontinuous as stage theorists believe, and his focus is on intelligence. This focus on intelligence separates his ideas from stage theorists because it rejects the idea of incremental stages, but rather suggests that development occurs in the same way throughout life differentiated only by the expertise of the learner to process new information….First, and very importantly, Sternberg’s model does not differentiate between child and adult learning….. Cognitive development is viewed as a novice to expert progression; as one becomes better at interaction and learning, one is able to learn more and at higher levels. Development changes as a result of feedback, self-monitoring, and automatization. In this theory, intelligence is comprised of three kinds of information processing components: metacomponents, performance components, and knowledge-acquisition components.”

 

“In Sternberg’s (1988) model, each of these three components works together to facilitate learning and cognitive development. Metacomponents are executive in nature. They guide the planning and decision making in reference to problem solving situations; they serve to identify the problem and connect it with experiences from the past….”

 

 “In summary, there are many different theories of information processing that focus on different aspects of perceiving, remembering, and reasoning. One of the most important agreements is that elaboration is a key to permanently storing information in a way that facilitates its quick retrieval when it is needed. Bloom et al (1956) and Anderson and Krathwohl (2000) provide some excellent suggestions as to how we can encourage increased elaboration among our students. However, as proposed by Hummel and Huitt (1994) if students are not required to demonstrate the results of elaboration on meaningful tasks such as examinations or projects, they are not likely to adequately develop the skills required for higher-level thinking. It is, therefore, imperative that educators and parents require the development and use of these skills as a normal process of students’ lives. If we do that, the amounts and types of student knowledge will increase dramatically and students will be better prepared for life as adults in the information age.”

 

 

                                                              

No Comments »

What is the Basis for a Teacher’s Beliefs About Learning

I’m starting my answer to this question with a “model” of learning that has had a significant influence on my learning and teaching since the 1980’s:  Authentic Learning.

Authentic Learning: An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments J. Herrington University of Wollongong, janherrington@gmail.com R. Oliver Edith Cowan University, r.oliver@ecu.edu.au

https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1031&context=edupapers  Excerpts

Abstract: The instructional technology community is in the midst of a philosophical shift from a behaviorist to a constructivist framework, a move that may begin to address the growing rift between formal school learning and real-life learning. One theory of learning that has the capacity to promote authentic learning is that of situated learning…..”

“There have been several attempts to use the findings of the research into contextualised learning to design a model of instruction….. However, it was Brown, Collins and Duguid (1989b) who developed a focus for the theory of situated cognition or situated learning and produced a proposal for a model of instruction that has implications for classroom practice. Collins (1988) defines situated learning as: ‘the notion of learning knowledge and skills in contexts that reflect the way the knowledge will be useful in real life’ (p. 2)….”

research aims The purpose of this research was to determine the possibility of applying a model of instructional design based on the theory of situated learning to the design of a multimedia learning environment for The university students, and to investigate students’ responses to that learning environment.”  Their original intent for this article, but my focus in on the background of the Authentic Learning Model.“…

…”usable knowledge is best gained in learning  environments which feature the following characteristics. Situated learning environments:“ How can these situated theories be operationalised?’ (Brown & Duguid, 1993, p. 10)… Brown, Collins and Duguid (1989b), in their original article presented a nascent theory of situated learning which has the potential to provide a theoretical basis for a new framework for multimedia design and development. From the start they suggested that their model was the beginning of the process of developing a theoretical perspective for successful learning that cognitive science had, to date, not been able to explain. The challenge put to researchers was to identify the critical aspects of situated learning to enable it to translate into teaching methods which could be applied in the classroom. In response to this challenge, a practical framework for the design of learning environments was produced. Essentially, current literature suggests that usable knowledge is best gained in learning environments which feature the following characteristics.  Situated Learning:

• Provide authentic context that reflect the way the knowledge will be used in real life   (e.g., Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Collins, 1988; Gulikers, Bastiaens, &  Martens, 2005)

• Provide authentic activities (e.g., Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, 1990; Jonassen, 1991; Young, 1993)

• Provide access to expert performances and the modelling of processes (e.g.,Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989; Lave & Wenger, 1991)

• Provide multiple roles and perspectives (e.g., Bransford, Sherwood, Hasselbring,Kinzer, & Williams, 1990; Honebein, Duffy, & Fishman, 1993; Lave & Wenger, 1991; Spiro, Feltovich, Jacobson, & Coulson, 1991)

• Support collaborative construction of knowledge (e.g., Bransford, Sherwood,Hasselbring, Kinzer, & Williams, 1990; Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989)

• Promote reflection to enable abstractions to be formed (e.g., Boud, Keogh, &Walker, 1985; Norman, 1993)

• Promote articulation to enable tacit knowledge to be made explicit (e.g., Lave &Wenger, 1991; Pea, 1991; Vygotsky, 1978)

• Provide coaching by the teacher at critical times, and scaffolding and fading of teacher support (e.g., Collins, 1988; Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989; Greenfield,1984; Harley, 1993)

• Provide for authentic, integrated assessment of learning within the tasks (e.g.,Gulikers, Bastiaens, & Kirschner, 2004; Herrington & Herrington, 1998; McLellan,1993; Reeves & Okey, 1996; Young, 1993, 1995).

No Comments »

Metacognition: A 28 Minute Video from The Annenberg Learner Site

From Annenberg Learner

Thinking About Thinking – Metacognition.  Understanding the Concept of Metacognition (Executive Function)  This is a wonderful resource!

https://www.learner.org/courses/learningclassroom/session_overviews/metacog_home9.html

9. Thinking About Thinking – Metacognition
“We can teach children to think about their thinking in ways that help them understand what they know and what they don’t know and what they’d like to learn, and to help them reflect on their learning and to evaluate their work against a continuum that they’re on. All of those kinds of thinking actually make the learning process more powerful.”
Linda Darling-Hammond

 

Key Questions:

  • How can people learn by reflecting on what they know and do?
  • How can teachers help students think about their own thinking?

Learning Objectives:

  1. Defining metacognition – Teachers will understand what metacognition is and how it improves learning. They will become familiar with two aspects of metacognition: reflection and self-regulation.
  2. Developing metacognitive skills – Teachers will understand what it means to develop a culture of metacognition in the classroom. Teachers will become familiar with strategies for helping students regulate, monitor, and guide their learning.

Video Program  28 minutes

This episode explores how thinking about thinking helps students to better manage their own learning and to learn difficult concepts deeply. The episode features two teachers – Kendra Hearn, who teaches senior English at West Bloomfield High School, West Bloomfield, Michigan, and Kathleen Hayes-Parvin, who teaches sixth grade at Birney Middle School, Southfield, Michigan. University of Michigan professor Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar and Lee S. Shulman, President of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching provide their insights for teache

“All material on this site has been made available for educational purposes and is intended for personal, non-commercial use.”

No Comments »

EMPOWER Learners

Exploring Models of Learning: Both Academic and SEL

Here’s a Model of Learning that I curate on Pinterest: EMPOWER Learners

There are many posts that focus on models or dimensions of learning!

https://www.pinterest.com/franvt/empower-learners/       

 

 

 

No Comments »

Executive Function and Designing Your Own Learning

 

What if young people designed their own learning?

 From: Conversation”

https://theconversation.com/what-if-young-people-designed-their-own-learning-59153

A few short “excerpts”…that reflect a model that emphasizes Context-Based Instruction, that Begins with a Plan to Understand and Collaborate with Individual Children

Why schools need to change

“The current system is clearly not working for a large number of students. Levels of disengagement within schools are high and increase as students pass through secondary school.

To carry on batching children into year groups and teaching them the same content partly explains why there are high levels of disengagement, stress and underachievement.

Schools recognise that today’s complex world needs students who are capable in different ways” …..

CUREE found that independent learning could improve academic performance, motivation and confidence. Studies showed some students in particular, such as those with special learning needs and socially excluded children, felt more engaged in their learning.

However, learning needed to be scaffolded with support and feedback. Teachers played a key role in facilitating students’ independence. Further empirical evidence would strengthen understanding of the size of the effect…..”

  • Read more in the series here.

 

No Comments »

My First Venture into Creating a Model of Executive Function/Metacognition

As part of my Online Course in 2010, I created the following slide share “model” of Executive Functioning/Metacognition.  My “model” continues as a work in progress:

Kids as executive learners from Fran Toomey

 

No Comments »

Beginning of the “Learning How to Learn” Blog–Part 2

In the summer of 2010, I ventured into an online course to learn how to create a wiki.  It was a one week online crash course….morning to midnight.  It was exciting and challenging.  There was always the threat that if you didn’t complete an assignment, you were out.  As a tech novice, I was always on the edge of failing.  But I made it and created my first wiki:  http://explorience1.pbworks.com/w/page/52643140/My%20Story.  The focus of that wiki was Learning How to Learn–Executive Function/Metacognition./Self-Directed Learning.

After that step, in 2011 I vaulted into creating a blog titled “want to learn.”  Here is the first entry I made:

On the Road to Learning: I am a learner, too!

All of the beginning tech work  as well as this blog was based on a course I taught from 1981 to 2006 at St. Michael’s College in the Special Education/Learning Disabilities Graduate Program, after completing a Ph.D. in Development and Learning at the University of Vermont.  I had an opportunity to teach that course (Development and Learning) once again in 2016 in a summer marathon.  It was quite a challenge, but helped me to update my knowledge base on Executive Function (E.F.), Metacognition, and Self-Directed Learning as well as Social Emotional Development and Learning.

As I restart this blog in 2018, I will focus on Executive Function/Metacogntion in relation to Literacy Learning, with a special emphasis on learning to read especially for children in K-12 who are dyslexic and/or economically disadvantaged.

The first few entries in this blog focused on essential questions about E.F. and Defining E.F.

No Comments »

What Do We Know About Executive Function and Struggling Learner

Here are some questions I plan to address over the next several weeks.

How early in their school life can we/do we identify struggling learners?

Do we know the relationship between struggling as a learner and Executive Function skill?

How do we/could we define Executive Function skills?

What role do learning practices of “voice,” “feedback,” “self-assessment,” “choice”….play in developing and using Executive Function skills.

Who are the co-developers of Executive Function?

 

 

No Comments »

Connecting Executive Function (Metacognition) to Learning

In  conversations  with students about their learning, we need to understand what they know about the “topic” of learning.  We need to ask where they acquired their knowledge of the topic of “learning.”  Ideally we hope they will compare their beliefs against their experiences as learners.

I believe that there is an expectation that teachers in their preparation (training) were required to “take” a course on learning.  What do teachers take away from such a course and apply to their teaching?  How does a teacher’s knowledge base about “learning” change over time?  Do teachers and students believe the same things about learning?  Do they talk about those beliefs?

As a starting place, I have researched recent articles on the topic of learning.  Over the next few weeks, I will blog about a few of these.

I start with a series of videos about learning featuring Linda Darling-Hammond and published by the Annenberg Foundation.  Here is the link:

https://www.learner.org/resources/series172.html

This is a series of 13 videos about learning covering a range of topics

The first is “How People Learn – Introduction to Leaning Theory and focuses on a discussion with teachers.

https://www.learner.org/courses/learningclassroom/session_overviews/intro_home1.html

 

 

 

No Comments »

Feedback and Learning How to Learn

Feedback pp from Fran Toomey
No Comments »

Skip to toolbar