learntolearn

Learn: what…why…how…you and…

Where Does “GRIT” Come From?

Girt and Learning

Posted by Bill Ferriter on Wednesday, 01/13/2016

A short “excerpt”

Yesterday, I had the chance to do some brainstorming about Design Thinking with John Spencer — a thinker and a friend that I greatly admire.  During the course of the conversation, I asked John why he thought that Design Thinking should play a role in modern classrooms.  His answer was a huge a-ha moment for me:

“Design thinking builds grit by giving a lot of slack.  We have this idea that perseverance comes form a buckle down and get it done mentality.  Design Thinking says you develop perseverance through tons of iterations and freedom to make mistakes and time to make revisions and improvements.”

Stew in that for a minute, would you?  John’s right:  We DO define grit as the ability to “buckle down and get it done,” don’t we?  

I’m not sure if that definition is a result of our compulsive obsession with bootstraps, our one-time belief that hard work is the Golden Ticket to Heaven, or the fact that we’ve been told time and again that instruction in our schools isn’t all that ‘rigorous’, but defining grit as a willingness to struggle through miserable experiences is a poisonous myth that harms students because it suggests that learning has to be painful in order to be meaningful.”

 http://www.teachingquality.org/content/blogs/bill-ferriter/poisonous-mythology-grittiness

No Comments »

How Well Do You Know Your Students?

School neuroscience unleashes students’ brain power

Districts deploy the science of learning to engage students, close achievement gaps and overcome disabilities By: Matt Zalaznick

Neuroscience-based software has helped educators in Kentucky’s Boone County Schools better pinpoint students’ strengths and weaknesses.

http://www.districtadministration.com/article/neuroscience-builds-students-brain-power

An excerpt:

”Educational neuroscience empowers teachers with new insights into how all students learn and holds promise for enhancing special ed, but myths and exaggerations sprouting up around the burgeoning field could lead to children being labeled, which could limit their abilities, experts say.

Recent neuroscience research has debunked some popular modern education concepts but reinforced others as more is understood about how learning changes the brain physically, says Daniel Ansari, a cognitive neuroscientist at The University of Western Ontario and a director of the International Mind, Brain and Education Society.

“The notion of personalized education is consistent with neuroscience, just not in the way we have carved up individual differences—such as visual learner or right- and left-brain learners,” Ansari says. “We need better measures to differentiate learners.”

 

No Comments »

Checking For Understanding: Start with the Student

53 Ways to Check…

Published November 11, 2014

http://www.edutopia.org/blog/dipsticks-to-check-for-understanding-todd-finley

A short excerpt:

A Simple Way to Gain Information from Your Students: Ask Them

When preservice teachers are confused as to why their students performed poorly on an assignment, I gently say, “Did you ask them why?” After all, having learners use their own vernacular to articulate why they are stuck can be profoundly useful for identifying where to target support.

According to the American Institute of Nondestructive Testing, the simplest tool to encourage student self-assessment is evaluative prompts:

  • How much time and effort did you put into this?
  • What do you think your strengths and weaknesses were in this assignment?
  • How could you improve your assignment?
  • What are the most valuable things you learned from this assignment?
No Comments »

What happened/is happening to “How We Learn”?

How We Think and Learn
http://www.edutopia.org/blog/2014-year-in-review-vicki-davis

14. Neuroscience Rising: How We Think About How We Think
And in all of this, the rapid acceleration of neuroscience has caused a proliferation of books on how we think and learn: Brain Rules, The Organized Mind, How We Learn, The Brain That Changes Itself, My Stroke of Insight, and more. The ability to study the brain is impacting every field — even sports and America’s beloved pastime of football as the significant damage from concussions is discovered.
Mindfulness and our need to disconnect and get into nature aren’t surprising as elements that help kids focus. Physical activities like those found on Noodle and play-based experiences are strengthening the mind-body connection.

No Comments »

Deeper Learning and Metacognition

Deeper Learning and Metacognition
Posted by Darlene M. Bassett at 2:03 AM
http://dbassett.blogspot.com/2014/12/deeper-learning-involves-meta-cognition.html
Note the multidimensional nature of deeper learning!

No Comments »

When Does Metacognition Begin?

I’d like to take 3 points of departure on this topic: Defining Metacognition, Expanding the concept, One other related concept.

First, when does the concept of “metacognition” first appear in the literature?

The earliest work (theory, research, writing) on metacognition began with the work of John Flavell, a student of Piaget, when he published an article in 1971 and used the term “metamemory.” Here’s the link and a few brief excerpts:

http://www.lifecircles-inc.com/Learningtheories/constructivism/flavell.html

“John Flavell of Stanford University is regarded as a foundation researcher in metacognition.”

“Flavell (1971) used the term metamemory in regard to an individual’s ability to manage and monitor the input, storage, search and retrieval of the contents of his own memory. Flavell invited the academic community to come forth with additional metamemory research, and this theme of metacognitive research has continued more than thirty years later…..”

“In his 1976 article, Flavell recognized that metacognition consisted of both monitoring and regulation aspects. It was here that the term metacognition was first formally used in the title of his paper….”

“….In the 1979 paper, Flavell proposed a formal model of metacognitive monitoring to include four classes of phenomena and their relationships. The four classes included (a) metacognitive knowledge, (b) metacognitive experiences, (c) tasks or goals, and (d) strategies or activities….”
Second, I’d note an updating of the concept in the form of a much broader concept “Theory of Mind.”

Second, has the concept been expanded?

In 1999, Flavell published an article on Cognitive Development: “Children’s Knowledge About the Mind” that took a much broader look at what children understood about their own minds, tracing development from infancy. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1999. 50:21.45
Copyright © 1999 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved

http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/faculty/pylyshyn/Proseminar08/Flavell.pdf

Third, I’d like to reference a narrower concept that addresses how children think about and “control” their own learning: Executive Function. Here I offer a 5 minute video from Harvard’s

Center on the Developing Child that looks at young children and what they know about learning.

No Comments »

Skip to toolbar