learntolearn

Learn: what…why…how…you and…

Student Voice and Choice: A Few Teacher/Learner Considerations

Here is an excerpt from a teacher’s point of view about student voice.  For me, this raises a lot of questions:

How do age/grade level impact student voice/choice?

How are choice and teacher mandates (CCSS, for example) related?

How does knowing “what it means to learn” influence student voice/choice.

Here is one starting place – from a high school teacher’s point of view:

Do We Give Students Too Much Choice? By Brian Field

http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/08/24/do-we-give-students-too-much-choice.html

August 23, 2016

A few brief excerpts:

There is an increased focus on student choice in K-12 education today. This focus has created more student-centered classrooms that use problem-based learning and differentiation of instruction to give students agency in what and how they learn. As a high school teacher, I understand why teachers feel the necessity to cater to all of their students’ strengths by providing opportunities for student choice. But, as schools try to incorporate student-centered initiatives into the classroom, there is often a lack of critical consideration for the potentially negative effects increased choice may have on student learning…..

 

The new question now becomes: What degree of choice should we have? Though these studies apply to retail, they have grounds in the field of education regarding student choice. As these studies help to show, the current debate surrounding this classroom strategy is not whether students should have choice, but to what degree student choice is effective…..

I have learned in my own experiences that effective feedback takes copious amounts of time when all students complete the same assignment—and the greater variety of student choice only increases that time. There needs to be a balance between an appropriate amount of student choice and the ability of the teacher to impart the feedback necessary to reach maximum student growth in a timely manner….

 

No Comments »

Connecting Student Voice, Thinking and Learning

A few more of the links from the Reading Sage post on Oracy

http://reading-sage.blogspot.com/2017/02/developing-oracy-with-daily-dialogue.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReadingSageReviews+%28Reading+Sage+Reviews%29

Just a few of many links on oracy from the Reading Sage posting

Oracy in the Classroom: Strategies for Effective Talk | Edutopia Oracy in the Classroom: Strategies for Effective Talk | Edutopia
Teaching oracy means putting more intention behind how you guide and organize your students’ talk. When they gather for group work or …

Oracy: The Literacy of the Spoken Word | Edutopia
Teaching oracy is instrumental to better reading and, in particular, writing. In developmental terms, humans acquire oral language first — a …

Oracy Assessment Toolkit : Faculty of Education
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the need to help young people develop their abilities to use spoken language effectively. Employers …
Teaching oracy means putting more intention behind how you guide and organize your students’ talk. When they gather for group work or …

No Comments »

SMART Goals for Learning

SMART GOALS for Learning from the Reading Sage

http://reading-sage.blogspot.com/2016/08/smart-gl-for-student-success.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReadingSageReviews+%28Reading+Sage+Reviews%29

A short excerpt:  Hope you read the whole post from August 20, 2016

SMART Gоаlѕ For Student Success!

Setting SMART Goals and Objectives with Students

 

“Creating SMART goals and student action plans (SAP) to address student learning and behavior issues is the key to turning around your classroom and your school.

Today the world is getting smarter and sharper than ever before.

 

Students who are goal oriented problem-solvers and possess a growth mindset will play a vital role in building the future of our world. So, today we need to guide parents and students to develop S.M.A.R.T. goals and objective to achieve their maximum potential. Unpacking the SMART goal-setting acronym and developing a SMART goal action plan, we have
S… Specific
M…Measurable
A…Attainable
R….Realistic
T…Timely and Tangible”…….

 

 

No Comments »

Learning Frameworks Focused on Individuals as Learners (6)

There are at least 3 other “teaching/learning” frameworks that are relevant to Executive Functioning: Individualizing Learning, Learner “Characteristics” and Habits, and Executive Function/Metacognition.  The first two–which address individual differences–will be the focus of this post.

INDIVIDUALIZING LEARNING as a framework comes in several different forms: Personalized Learning, Differentiated Instruction, Universal Design and Learning Styles.  Each of these suggests that we need to understand individual learners and how learners differ.

  1. Personalized Learning

”Personalized learning is happening now and will expand significantly worldwide in 2016. Yet there are still different definitions for personalized learning and even some have concerns about what it means for kids. We know the main focus of personalized learning is our kids. So we are focusing on three main concepts for these trends we see for 2016 starting with learners, the teachers, and pulling together everything with culture and community that encompass the 10 Trends

http://www.personalizelearning.com/2015/12/10-trends-to-personalized-learning-in.html

Posted below are excerpts that seem to be most closely related to “Learning How to Learn.”

Focus on Learners includes the following topics: Discover the Learner, Learner Agency, Competency-Based and Kids Hacking School. Within this element of the framework, the following are most relevant to work on Executive Function.

Learner Agency: ” . It is about having a sense of ‘agency’ when we feel in control of things that happen around us; when we feel that we can influence events. This happens when teachers focus on learning as the goal by allowing flexibility in the pace at which learners are expected to learn. You will definitely be hearing more about “agency” in 2016.”

Hacking School:  “Kids tend to be smarter than we give them credit. Since the system was created to encourage compliancy, many kids learn right from kindergarten to follow orders and do what the teacher tells them to do. However, because of the access to information on social media and conversations with their peers, they are learning to question, be curious, and even skeptical about “school”. They also are realizing with all that is available at their fingertips, they can teach themselves what they want to learn.”

Focus on Teachers Includes: Educator Competencies, Voice and Choice, and Blended Learning.

Voice and Choice: ” Providing choice can be confusing. If learners are choosing from a set of pre-planned choices from a computer program or a list of options from the teacher, then the teacher is ultimately the one responsible for the learning not the learner. As learners increase responsibility around voice, teachers can also provide a process that builds ownership as learners move toward agency with choice. 2016 will be the year we see more examples and strategies of learner voice and choice along the continuum around the world.”

Focus on Culture and Community includes: Common Language, Building Citizenship and Community as School.

Common Language: “….Personalized Learning is a culture shift. It is about transforming teaching school or district to Personalized Learning Environments, all stakeholders need to have a common language and understanding around personalized learning in conversations inside and outside of school…’

See also a related Model- The Institute for Personalized Learning: http://www.cesa1.k12.wi.us/institute/index.cfm

  1. Differentiating Learning

Another framework that addresses the topic of individualizing learning is “Differentiated Learning.” This framework is so widely known that it will not be discussed at length here, but see: http://www.edutopia.org/article/differentiated-instruction-resources

I still find Tomlinson’s The Differentiated Classroom (1999) the best source for a basic understanding of this framework, especially the Appendix. The “Equalizer” offers concrete dimensions of learning to consider.

  1. Universal Design for Learning

Universal Design for Learning is still another framework for understanding individual differences in learners. See: http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl This is UDL Center’s very detailed description of this framework with multiple print version options. The focus is on 3 principles of UDL: Recognition of the multiple means of representation, multiple means for students to express their learning, and multiple ways to stimulate interest and motivation.

Universal Design and Expert Learners http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/expertlearners

  1. Learning Style(s)

Learning Style. If you “google” learning styles,” you will get links that range from Multiple Intelligences to a Wikipedia inventory, including criticisms: See, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_styles

http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_199010_curry.pdf  This concept requires considerable caution as many of the “learning style” models have not been researched or have not been found to be consistent with what we know about learning and learners.

LEARNER “CHARACTERISTICS” OR “HABITS”

These frameworks focus on particular learner “characteristics” or “habits” that are assumed to be central to a student’s ability, achievement, awareness, and/or approach to learning. You will see some/much overlap in these models. Some of the more current frameworks include.

  1. Growth Mindset:

Recognizing and Overcoming False Growth Mindset | Edutopia

www.edutopia.org/blog/…overcoming-false-growth-mindset-carol-dweck

Examples of a false growth mindset include praising effort over progress, affirming students’ potential without enabling them, and blaming their mindset instead of …

Carol Dweck: The power of believing that you can improve …

www.ted.com/talks/carol_dweck_the_power_of_believing_that_you_can…

B Grit:

Grit: Angela Lee Duckworth: The key to success? Grit | TED Talk …

www.ted.com/talks/angela_lee_duckworth_the_key_to_success_grit?…

Video embedded · At the University of Pennsylvania, Angela Lee Duckworth studies intangible concepts such as self-control and grit to determine how they might predict

 

True Grit: The Best Measure of Success and How to Teach It …

www.edutopia.org/blog/true-grit-measure-teach-success-vicki-davis

Edutopia blogger Vicki Davis identifies the nature of grit, its necessity and value of grit in education, and ten ways of teaching students to develop their own grit.

 

Teaching Grit: How to Help Students Overcome Inner …

www.edutopia.org/blog/grit-help-students-overcome-inner-obstacles…

Video embedded · Teaching Grit Cultivates Resilience and Perseverance (Research Made Relevant Series) Amy: Kenny is a student that participated in my grit program

 

  1. Habits of Mind identified by Costa and Kallick …

This model warrants consideration because it is well developed and widely used in school districts..

Of the 16 “Habits” the following seem particularly relevant to Executive Functioning and Independent Learning: Persistence, Managing Impulsivity, Thinking Flexibly, Thinking About Thinking, Thinking Interdependently, Remaining Open to Continuous Learning, Questioning and Posing Problems, Applying Past Knowledge to New Situations, Creating, Imagining and Innovating, and Taking Responsible Risks.

www.ccsnh.edu/sites/default/files/content/documents/CCSNH MLC

  1. The Self-…Models There are several models with the title “self—something”.

Agency: http://www.personalizelearning.com/2015/10/learner-voice-demonstrates-commitment.html

 

Self-Regulated Learning: These models are particularly relevant to social learning issues.

Barry Zimmerman Discusses Self-Regulated Learning

archive.sciencewatch.com/dr/erf/2011/11decerf/11decerfZimm

Barry Zimmerman Discusses Self-Regulated Learning Processes; Emerging Research Front commentary from the field of Social Sciences, general.

Self-Regulated Learning: http://www.rhartshorne.com/fall-2012/eme6507-rh/cdisturco/eme6507-eportfolio/documents/zimmerman.pdf

 

Self-Directed Learning:

http://classroom-aid.com/2013/03/23/self-directed-learning-well-explained/

and http://www.ciera.org/library/archive/2001-04/0104prwn.pdf

.

Self-Efficacy: http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/BanEncy.html  This model by Bandura is a behavioral/social model that offers an important perspective on

http://www.theoryfundamentals.com/bandura.htm on Observational learning

Looking across these frameworks it is possible to see that we expect students to become increasingly independent as learners. How well they can/will become independent learners depends on what learners know about learning in general and their own learning in particular. And that will depend at least in part on their teacher(s) and the learning environment.

Next the focus will shift to resources specific to “Executive Function” as it applies in general, in the classroom, and for students who struggle with learning.

 

 

 

 

 

 

No Comments »

Kids as Executive Learners (5): Understanding By Design (UbD)

This is the last in a series of learning framework that focuses more generally on how students learn, although each has some reference to the concept of self-management. Subsequent posts will look at two other types of teaching/learning frameworks: individualizing learning and personal qualities of learners, which focus more singularly and specifically on ideas related to “executive function”.

In this post I focus on what I understand to be the connections between the PORTALS framework and the Understanding by Design framework.  The connections noted come from a publication that lists “The Big Ideas of Understanding by Design,” published in http://www.grantwiggins.org/documents/UbDQuikvue1005.pdf For additional details of their work, see the links below the chart.

Portals Door ppp Understanding by Design by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe is a well- developed framework first published as a text in 1998 and revised in 2005.

In listing their Big Ideas of Understanding by Design, they list #1 as “UbD is a way of thinking purposefully about curriculum planning and school reform, a set of helpful design tools, and design standards—not a program or recipe.” (p. 14)  I directly quote these Big Ideas below.

PURPOSE 6 UbD transforms Content Standards and other goals into focused learning targets based on “big ideas” and transfer tasks.
OPERATIONS 3 Evidence of understanding is revealed through performance—when learners transfer knowledge and skills effective—using one or more “facets” (explain, interpret, apply, shift perspectives, empathize, and self-assess).
REMEMBERING 2  “…and the ability to transfer learning….”
TEAM WORK 4 Educators are coaches of understanding, not mere purveyors of content and activity.

8 UbD reflects a “continuous improvement” approach to design and learning. The results of our curriculum designs (e.g., assessment results, quality of student work, degree of learner engagement) inform needed adjustments.

ACTION 2 The end goals of UbD is understanding and the ability to transfer learning—to appropriately connect, make sense of, and use discrete knowledge and skills in context.

5 Planning is best done “backward” from the desired results and the transfer tasks that embody the goals.

LAYING A FOUNDATION 2   “….to appropriately connect, make sense of, and use discrete knowledge (and skills) in context.”
SELF-MANAGEMENT 7 Design Standards guide self-assessment and peer reviews of curriculum, instruction, and assessment for quality control.

 

For additional information about the Understanding by Design framework, see the links below.

See McTighe’s ASCD article on the “confluence of evidence from two streams—theoretical research in cognitive psychology, and results of student achievement studies.” Found at

http://jaymctighe.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/A_Summary_of_Underlying_Theory_and_Research2.pdf

For a detailed description of this UbD work see:

http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312.pdf

Source: Adapted from Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2011). The Understanding by Design guide to creating high-quality units. Alexandria, VA: ASCD

Or see comments on the 2nd Edition:

http://www.ascd.org/Publications/Books/Overview/Understanding-by-Design-Expanded-2nd-Edition.aspx

About This Book

”What is understanding and how does it differ from knowledge? How can we determine the big ideas worth understanding? Why is understanding an important teaching goal, and how do we know when students have attained it? How can we create a rigorous and engaging curriculum that focuses on understanding and leads to improved student performance in today’s high-stakes, standards-based environment?

Authors Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe answer these and many other questions in this second edition of Understanding by Design. Drawing on feedback from thousands of educators around the world who have used the UbD framework since its introduction in 1998, the authors have greatly revised and expanded their original work to guide educators across the K–16 spectrum in the design of curriculum, assessment, and instruction…. “

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No Comments »

Mistakes: One Key to Learning How to Learn

Highlighting Mistakes:  A Grading Strategy (7 minute video)

Leah Alcala shows how she turns kids’ mistakes on tests into whole-class learning moments

https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/math-test-grading-tips/?utm_source=newsletter20151128/

We can’t learn if we don’t know what we don’t know.  Here is a short video from a courageous teacher who is willing to take the risk of doing something different.

No Comments »

Meta Foundation 3: Students Learn ABOUT Something

Meta Found #3: Students learn about something and use a variety of cognitive and affective processes to accomplish that learning.

There is a long history about how to help kids become better learners, even life-long learners. Ideas range from separate “courses” on study skills to approaches based on “learner differences.” More recently the affective domain has directed attention of to the role of affective factors in children becoming better learners, life-long learners: motivation (intrinsic and/or extrinsic), engagement, attribution theory, and more recently grit, perseverance, mindfulness and the growth mindset. And, of course, there have been approaches labeled “Learner differences” suggesting that there is something different about individual learners that need to be addressed if we expect children to learn at their optimal rate. In the past there has been attention to learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic; extrovert/introvert), multiple intelligences (Howard Gardner attempted to help us understand learners in terms of 7 (8?) domains of strength: Musical, Linguistic, Spatial, Interpersonal, Personal, Body-Kinesthetic, Logical-Mathematical), “gifted and not gifted,” differentiated instruction, and diagnostic teaching.

What is being learned!
There are also approaches to learning (meta learning if you will) that suggest that there are “laws of learning” that must be addressed if we expect all children to become achievers, life-long learners. I want to focus on two of those kinds of approaches, both of which suggest that “what” the child is learning is essential to understanding how the child learns. First is the work of two sets of experts on “learning”: Bransford, Brown, and Cocking (How People Learn) and Howard Gardner (5 Minds for the Future).

The second example focuses not on specific disciplines or conceptual networks but does look at “what” (content, topic) the child is learning while s/he is learning it: super heroes, dinosaurs, farm animals, baseball, matter, binomials. Diagnostic teaching, formative assessment, and differentiated instruction reflect this approach. This is not learning in the abstract. Nor is it leaning about a discipline, but it is about learning something in particular. With these examples the question becomes whether or not the learner can generalize the “learning to learn” skills to other “content.”

In this post, I will briefly address: The Affective Domain Approach and the “Discipline/Subject Area Approach. The next post will address Individual Differences as they are observed in learning specific “content.”

The “Affective Domain” Approach
I believe that we need to make every effort to build a learner’s intrinsic motivation, ability to analyze the relationship between effort (rather than luck or “being smart”) and learning. I think a “growth” mindset is essential for taking on challenging tasks and not giving up when mistakes are made. And I certainly think kids learn better when they have grit and perseverance. I have seen far too many children “give up” because they think they are dumb. Some even drop out of school physically as well as emotionally. We know that kids as young as preschool don’t like to “make mistakes.” And we know that some kids start paying more attention to ‘grades” than learning as young as first grade. This topic deserves its own blog post (coming later).

The “Subject (Discipline) Area” Approach
A well respected summary of “How People Learn” was published in 2000 by the National Academy of Sciences. It was edited by John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking. They listed the three key findings from this research, documented with 63 pages of references (as in “reached based pedagogy).”
1 “Students come to the classroom with preconceptions about how the world works. If their initial understanding is not engaged, they may fail to grasp the new concepts and information that are taught, or they may learn them for purposes of a test but revert to their preconceptions outside the classroom.” (p. 15)
2 “To develop competence in an area of inquiry, students must: (a) have a deep foundation of factual knowledge, (b) understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and (c) organize knowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and application.” (p. 16)
3 “A “metacognitive” approach to instruction can help students learn to take control of their own learning by defining leaning goals and monitoring their progress in achieving them.” (p. 18)

They followed with three “Implications for teaching.”
1 “Teachers must draw out and work with the preexisting understandings that their students bring with them.” (p. 19)
2 “Teachers must teach some subject matter in depth, providing many examples in which the same concept is at work and providing a firm foundation of factual knowledge.” (p. 20)
3 “The teaching of metacognitive skills should be integrated into the curriculum in a variety of subject areas.” (p. 21)

In a second example of this “discipline-based” learning, Howard Gardner writes about “5 Minds for the Future.” These five minds are: The disciplined mind, the synthesizing mind, the creating mind, the respectful mind, the ethical mind. Note the affective as well as cognitive categories. He tells us that he isn’t simply shifting from one set of intelligences to another set. Rather, he is suggesting that there are a set of minds (5 at present in his work) that we need to navigate and thrive in the current world. In response to the question: Why use the word mind? He responds.

“Admittedly, for a psychologist interested in mental processes I am stretching the usual connotation of the word mind. One could substitute “five capacities” or “five perspectives.” But the word mind reminds us that actions, thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are all products of our brain. If we want to nurture these capacities or change these perspectives, we will be trafficking in the operations of the mind.” (p. xv)

Gardner does not advocate children making a commitment to a specific discipline, but says they can learn to “think in a disciplined manner.” He lists 4 steps to becoming a “disciplined” thinker: (pp. 32-35).

1 Identify truly important topics or concepts
2 Spend a significant amount of time on this topic.
3 Approach he topic in a number of ways.
4 Most important, set up “performances of understanding.” This means” giving students ample opportunities to perform their understanding under a variety of conditions [that is, to generalize]…. publically, with formative exercises, with detailed feedback on where the performance is adequate, where it falls short, why it falls short, and what can be done to fine-tuning the performance.”

No Comments »

Why the 7 P.O.R.T.A.L.S. learning skill?

Learning is complex.  Why choose these 7 skills to focus on?
*Because both teachers and learners need a manageable set of dimensions to analyze when learning breakdowns occur.
*Because these 7 skills have strong support in the learning  research literature as skills that play a significant role in facilitating or impede learning.
*Because they make sense to teachers and learners, as reflected in learner stories and teacher stories.
*Because they are highly relevant to cognitive development.
*Because they are highly relevant beyond the classroom.
No Comments »

Skip to toolbar